
..simulating the signaling and morphology of cells on the move.

Fig 1: Example of the structure of the artificial matrix in the model.

Fig 2: Simulation of sprouting angiogenesis: “mother” vessel on the left and migrating tips on the right-hand side.
Cell migration is a crucial element of embryogenesis and homeostatic processes such as the repair of injured tissues. Furthermore, it appears in numerous pathologies including vascular disease, tumor growth, metastasis, and the cancer-related formation of new lymphatic and blood vessel networks. The potential returns of understanding the underlying principles of cell migration are as pervasive as migration itself: they range from improvements in the manufacture of artificial tissues, new strategies for anti-angiogenic therapy, to restraining invasive tumors.
When cells migrate they are subjected to both complex biochemical and mechanical migration cues. In order to assess the effect of different cues on migration patterns or morphologies I developed a model which is based on a continuum representation of the cells, so the spatial distribution of cells is determined by a density function for each cell type. This approach renders implementations of this model efficient and scalable, therefore enabling the tackling of macroscopic 3D systems of migration. Cell density functions are approximated using smooth particle approximations, which allows the model to represent small cell clusters in a mesoscale manner. The use of particles also opens up the possibility to couple the model to microscale descriptions, e.g. the explicit modeling of the extension of filopodia, the sensing antennas of the cell [2].
As cells migrate, they plough their way through a mesh of fibrous proteins (e.g. collagen, fibronectin and elastin). This extracellular matrix serves as a scaffolding along which cells can pull themselves forward. It also accommodates growth factors and other signaling proteins, which can exert highly localized biochemical cues on cells.
One key enrichment of the present model over many existing approaches, is the way it accounts for this extracellular matrix; the matrix consists of a random collection of lines, which interacts with the cell density through “cell-matrix” adhesion and by harboring growth factors (see Figures 1 and 2).
This advantage becomes clear when we apply the model to sprouting angiogenesis, the new formation of blood vessels from existing ones: in contradistinction to models using cellular automata based descriptions (e.g. McDougall et al. [3]), here the branching pattern of the vasculature is an output of the simulation, and not an imposed parameter. By virtue of this approach, we were for instance able to capture the increased branching as induced by matrix-bound growth factors [4].
[1] T. Werbowetski, R. Bjerkvig, and F. Del Maestro. Evidence for a secreted chemorepellent that directs glioma cell invasion. Journal of Neurobiology, 60(1):71–88, 2004.
[2] F. Milde, M. Bergdorf, and P. Koumoutsakos. A hybrid model for 3D simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. Biophys. J., submitted, 2007.
[3] M. Bergdorf, F. Milde, and P. Koumoutsakos. Mesoscale models of mesenchymal motion, in preparation, 2007
[4] S. R. McDougall, A. R. A. Anderson, and M. A. J. Chaplain. Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: Clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241(3):564–589, 2006.
Read more...